Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Key Health Indicators

The Key Health Indicators selected by Kansas Health Matters represent a foundation for community health needs assessment efforts. These 20 indicators address health issues that are most prevalent throughout Kansas.
 
The Kansas Health Matters partnership recommends these measures be part of every health assessment and improvement discussion. While communities may want to address other issues, the key indicators should be reviewed.

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

State: Kansas

Exercise, Nutrition, & Weight

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas

Exercise, Nutrition, & Weight

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas Percent of Adults Doing Enough Physical Activity To Meet Both The Aerobic AND Strengthening Exercise Recommendations

20.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (20.3%), Kansas has a value of 20.3%.
US Value
(20.3% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (20.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (19.0%).
Prior Value
(19.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Percent of Adults who are Overweight

Current Value:
34.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (35.3%), Kansas has a value of 34.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(35.3% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (34.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (34.8%).
Prior Value
(34.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas

Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas

Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas Percent of Infants Fully Immunized at 24 Months

71.1%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (71.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (69.2%).
Prior Value
(69.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Sexually Transmitted Disease Rate

Current Value:
6.1
Cases per 1,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (6.1) is less and better than the previously measured value (6.7).
Prior Value
(6.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas

Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas

Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas Infant Mortality Rate

Current Value:

State: Kansas Infant Mortality Rate

5.9
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.9), Kansas has a value of 5.9.
US Value
(5.9 in 2012-2016)
The regional value is compared to the most current national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (5.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.9).
Prior Value
(5.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.0), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)

State: Kansas Percent of births Where Mother Smoked During Pregnancy

6.9%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.9%), Kansas has a value of 6.9%.
US Value
(6.9% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (6.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (7.9%).
Prior Value
(7.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Percent of Births with Low Birth Weight

Current Value:
7.5%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (8.3%), Kansas has a value of 7.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.3% in 2015-2017)
The regional value is compared to the most current single year national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (7.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.4%).
Prior Value
(7.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas

Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas

Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas Age-adjusted Heart Disease Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

170.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (165.0), Kansas has a value of 170.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(165.0 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (170.4) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (167.8).
Prior Value
(167.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Age-adjusted Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

878.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (731.9), Kansas has a value of 878.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(731.9 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (878.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (843.3).
Prior Value
(843.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas Age-adjusted Suicide Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

19.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (14.0), Kansas has a value of 19.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.0 in 2015-2017)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2017) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (19.3) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (18.5).
Prior Value
(18.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (12.8), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)

State: Kansas Age-adjusted Traffic Injury Mortality Rate per 100,000 population

14.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (11.4), Kansas has a value of 14.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.4 in 2014-2016)
The Kansas State value is compared to the U.S. value. U.S. comparison value is taken from the most recent single year (2015) NCHS preliminary data report.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (14.8) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (14.2).
Prior Value
(14.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.1)

State: Kansas

Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas

Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas Percent of Adults with Fair or Poor Self-Perceived Health Status

14.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (17.7%), Kansas has a value of 14.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(17.7% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (14.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (16.7%).
Prior Value
(16.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas

Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas

Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas Rate of Violent Crime per 1,000 Population

Current Value:
4.4
Crimes per 1,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (3.7), Kansas has a value of 4.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.7 in 2015)
The Kansas State value is compared to the US value. Under reporting of crime by some public safety jurisdictions may result in lower rates.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (4.4) is less and better than the previously measured value (4.6).
Prior Value
(4.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas

Poverty

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas

Poverty

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas Uninsured Adult Population Rate

Current Value:
13.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Kansas has a value of 13.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0% in 2016)
The state value is compared to the U.S. value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (13.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (12.5%).
Prior Value
(12.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Kansas

Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas

Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

State: Kansas Percent of Adults with Diagnosed Hypertension

Current Value:
34.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (32.3%), Kansas has a value of 34.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(32.3% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kansas (34.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (32.8%).
Prior Value
(32.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kansas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (27.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(27.7%)
Kansas Health Matters